Week Ten
This week I think I have improved in my teaching of ELA,
though I’m not where I want to be yet. Looking
at the week in ELA as a gradual release of responsibility to the students really
helps. We "front load" the explicit and intentional teaching on Monday and Tuesday, with the students doing more independent work as the week goes on. In math and science the timing of
the weeks is a little bit different. We
are not typically starting with something new on Monday with the expectation of
the students working on it independently by Friday. The students are still working toward mastery
of the standard, but they do not necessarily follow a weekly trajectory like
ELA.
My CT paid me a compliment today. She said I do a good job teaching math and
science and that she wants me to gain that same confidence when I teach
ELA. I think part of the problems is
that I have an affinity for teaching math and science because I enjoy the
black-and-white nature of it. There is
more gray area with ELA. There is more
subjectivity. Of course a noun is a noun
and a verb is a verb, etc. However, there
just seems to be more wiggle room or leeway in ELA. I do not do well with wiggle room I guess.
There are a number of areas in classroom management that are
clear areas where I need to improve. I
am getting better, but still need work. These
include:
- Giving directions. I need to make sure I have the students’ undivided attention, give clear and succinct directions, and write them on the board. I also need to use the tactic of making myself unavailable after directions have been given so that kids can’t ask me immediately after I give directions what they are supposed to be doing. They can read the directions on the board or ask a friend if they were not listening.
- Improve transitions. This is related to giving directions. I need to give the kids directions as indicated above, set a time limit, and remind students that the expectation is that they are silent and efficient during transitions.
- Accountability. Classroom management becomes easier when students are aware that they are all accountable for the material during the lesson. The two biggest things that have helped me with this are making explicit reference to the learning objectives (in the form of “I can” statements) and to use the Popsicle sticks with the students’ names on them to randomly call on students.
- Simultaneous instruction and management. I find this difficult, especially if I am not totally confident in the material or lesson that I am teaching. I end up alternating the two rather than integrating them (not on purpose).
- Setting expectations. Giving directions, setting the expectation about talking during an activity, setting expectations of behavior during partner and group activities, etc. all contribute to better outcomes for student behavior.
I must help foster an excellent learning environment, as
delineated in Illinois Professional Teaching Standard 4K, which states, “The
competent teacher uses strategies to create a smoothly functioning learning
community in which students assume responsibility for themselves and one
another, participate in decision-making, work collaboratively and
independently, use appropriate technology, and engage in purposeful learning
activities.”
Other than classroom management, something else that I have
been struggling with is the acceptable definition of success for students. As a student, I like to get 100% and A+ on
everything. (If extra credit is available, I want that too.)
This has trickled down to
having very high expectations of academic achievement in my own children (grades
5, 3, 2, and pre-K – not so much my preschooler of course). I am blessed – they are bright kids, good
readers, and more or less well-behaved at school. Based on their abilities, schoolwork, and
standards at school, I pretty much expect my children to get straight A’s at
this point. They are capable of doing
this and for the most part get excellent grades.
In contrast, most students in my class would not be
considered straight A students. This, of
course, is fine. I can see their
struggles and their efforts. I am
helping them to improve. They are working hard and they are learning. Many of them are receiving
help in the forms of math intervention, reading interventions, OT, PT, speech,
etc. However, there are only maybe two or three
children who would be considered straight A students. I hope I am not conveying a sense of
arrogance or anything. I’m not saying
that my children are geniuses and my students are not. Of course I do not believe this. My students have a lot of struggles in school and at home, and many
of their parents have different expectations regarding their schoolwork than I do. My problem is this: How do I know what grades
are OK and which are not?
I think I have
a skewed sense of what is an acceptable grade. For example, one student from my math intervention group got 14 out of 17 or
an 82% on the recent math test. This is
a good and successful grade for this student.
If one of my own children got an 82% on a math test, I would be very
concerned and would probably grill them about their understanding of the material and their
studying. They might even be the lucky recipient of a homemade math test that I would use to check what they know. I have talked to my own children, however, about their effort being
the most important thing. So if they
got an 82% on a test that they studied hard for about a topic that they
struggled with, I would be happy with an 82%. I do not accept lack of effort. I think that as I get more experience as a teacher, I will get a better
handle on this. Comparing with other
teachers will also offer insight. I have already discussed this more than once with my CT and it has given me plenty to think about.
Things brings me to a question I have been pondering. My CT has been working on curriculum mapping for language arts for the district. The big question that they have to address when writing grade level common assessments is this: What does mastery look like? That is the question on my mind, but I certainly do not have the answer.
Depends! Mastery looks different for every school that uses different programs. It must be established by the curriculum committee for the school/district. Grades are a subjective thing even with rubrics. i do believe effort should be applauded with an understanding that the student may be working at his/her mastery level. I think sometimes we forget that we are working with people not robots. At the same time, as a teacher I do not want to give kids a sense that 82% is great when if we push a bit, they can do 92%. Hard being a teacher sometimes!!!
ReplyDelete